A reporting layer
over evaluation
infrastructure.
Evaluation Cards is a collection of reported model–benchmark results, organized under a five-level rollout hierarchy and four interpretive signals computed over the joined record.
Interpretive signals
Four signals computed over each (model, benchmark, metric-path) record and aggregated to the corpus level. Per-record instances appear on every model and benchmark page.
of reported scores have a complete setup recorded. The rest cannot be independently re-run.
93% have at least one undocumented field. Most often missing: temperature (92%), max tokens (91%).
mean across 107,399 reported score triples.
Observed range: 7% to 93%.
of reported score triples have reports from more than one party.
75% third-party, 22% first-party of 107,399 unique triples.
of setup-eligible groups diverge across variants (574 of 2,899).
Cross-party divergence: 23%.
Benchmark families
All 91 →Mercor ACE
1 reported benchmark across this family.
AgentHarm
1 reported benchmark across this family.
How Inference Compute Shapes Frontier LLM Evaluation
7 reported benchmarks across this family.
aiXamine
54 reported benchmarks across this family.
Alpaca-EVAL-V1
1 reported benchmark across this family.
Alpaca-EVAL-V2
1 reported benchmark across this family.
Every score resolves to an explicit path through this hierarchy, so aggregate claims drill down to the evidence supporting them.